In order to address pressing issues relating to agricultural land, it is necessary to establish a permanent, sufficient control over the "movement" of the earth. It is advisable to enter the field number of restrictions and control measures for land in this category. In particular, the regional authorities should reduce the minimum rental period of the earth. First, it will bring to the increasing number of agricultural organizations, holders of land shares, which would not be concerned about the inability to sell his land on favorable terms for a long time, and secondly, local authorities will be unable to transfer the land for the construction of objects that do not have to Agriculture Domestic irrelevant. It came in several regions of the country, for example in the Kostroma region. Kostroma Oblast Duma deputies have made changes in the regional law on agricultural land turnover destination, reducing the minimum rental period of arable land from 15 years to 11 months, and grazing - up to 6 months (Anton Shaturskii "amendment on the border." Rossiyskaya Gazeta "(Upper Volga ) № 4365, 17.05.2007). In addition, measures should be taken to a clear realization of Clause 3, Article. 6 of the Act, that is to provide the legal basis for monitoring the proper use of farmland, the relevant purposeful plot. It requires specific actions of local governments to monitor the relevant land, as well as the adoption of municipal normative legal acts or the establishment of special committees within the local administration, especially since the federal legislation, in particular the Act on general principles, gave them such authority. Stumbling blocks to implementing the above measures prevent a gap in the federal regulations - neither one of them provided the prosecution of violators of the law of the land by local governments. This gap must be remedied by giving the municipal authorities or bodies authorized by them that opportunity. Otherwise, control is reduced only to passive observation, recording violations. Also troubling failure to federal entities, as provided for in the regional law cases, municipalities emption selling plots of agricultural land. Municipal budget can not compare with the regional treasury, local authorities were willing to sell farmland than buy. It is important to establish conditions under which municipalities will be able to receive subsidized funds from the higher budget. In the Naro-Fominsk region of Moscow main land purchase occurred in 2002-2004. The lion's share of land shares into the hands of "Naro-Fominsk agro-industrial complex", which brought together 10 agricultural organizations in the area. Part of the land allotted agricultural holding resold, the rest being used properly. In other areas, and areas the situation is more depressing. According to the Accounting Chamber of Russia, in Tver region the total area of agricultural land owned by the producers of agricultural products in 2004 decreased by 22 thousand hectares of arable land in this area has decreased by 14.5 thousand hectares in 2005 total area of land has decreased by 22.1 thousand hectares of arable land area decreased by 8.7 thousand hectares (Accounts Chamber of Russia "report on the results of actions" Testing the effectiveness of the use of agricultural land and agricultural enterprises and organizations in Moscow and Tver regions, " № 4 (112). 2007). There is another side to the problem of agricultural lands - no one had used large areas of such lands. For example, according to the Office of Rosnedvizhimost Tver region, as of 1 January 2006 the total area of the region amounted to 8420.1 thousand hectares, including agricultural land - 4706.7 thousand hectares, ie 55.9% of the total area region. This arable land is not used by 50%, grasslands - 70%. Here it is appropriate to recall once the proposal the governor of Moscow region on quotas for sites suitable for redevelopment. The main thing is that implementation of this proposal is not only led to an increase in bribes. To achieve this, or at least minimize this risk may be through a public competition to occupy sites suitable for redevelopment. Calculation of quotas and the choice of land for redevelopment must be done by a special commission, consisting mainly of professionals rather than bureaucrats, decisions should be taken collectively, that is, committee members should have equal rights. Perhaps we should tentatively accept applications from interested persons on the inclusion of certain sites in the quota. Consideration of the size of the annual quota should be limited to a sufficient time to fully examine all aspects of the case. Innovation has always lead to higher prices of land, but to streamline and rationalize the use of land.